Search for: "Scalia v. United States" Results 401 - 420 of 4,623
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2011, 7:24 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Adler) Some Texans, including the current governor, maintain that Texas retained the right to secede when it joined the United States. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 9:10 am by appealattorneylaw
Now that the Mardi Gras season is over, the federal criminal defense and immigration defense lawyers in Palm Beach, Broward, and Miami Dade county may want to take a few moments moment to read a newly issued opinion from the United States Supreme Court: Kawashima v. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 1:37 pm
As was recently reported on this blog, this past May the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Ashcroft v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 10:16 am by Kent Scheidegger
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit today announced its decision in United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 8:06 am
Breyer delivered the opinion of the Court (except as to one subsection of the opinion) in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 2:30 pm
The United States Supreme Court has taken a strong pro-defendant interpretation of the confrontation clause, with Justice Scalia authoring both the Melendez-Diaz decision and the Crawford decision. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 11:38 am by Jared Klaus
It comes as no surprise that the United States Supreme Court’s decision in American Express Co. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 3:29 pm
And does the United States take that position today? [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 11:24 am by Larry Tribe
I focus here only on the Court’s invalidation of Section 3 of DOMA in United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 2:11 pm by Kent Scheidegger
United States, for example, his opinion for the Court decided whether the search was legal (no) and left it to the lower court to decide whether exclusion was required under existing law. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 8:55 pm by Mark Tushnet
United States contain discussions of what both call legislative history, with nary a comment from anyone about the possible impropriety of "relying on" legislative history in statutory interpretation cases. [read post]
29 Jun 2024, 7:57 pm by Josh Blackman
One of my favorite Scalia lines came in Clinton v. [read post]