Search for: "Schroeder v Schroeder" Results 401 - 420 of 459
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2009, 6:12 am
Shogren, Domestic politics and climate change: international public goods in two-level games Maria Julia Trombetta, Environmental security and climate change: analysing the discourse Shirley V. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 1:45 am
 A2237 Schroeder -- Authorizes the court to order sexual offenders on probation to terms of imprisonment which run consecutively to sentences already being served Same as S 623 Last Act: 01/15/09 referred to codesA2271 Reilich (MS) -- Relates to providing certain relief for persons who are victims of identity theft No Same asLast Act: 01/15/09 referred to codesA2375 Diaz (MS) -- Imposes civil liability of owners for persons bitten by the dog… [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 11:08 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, sitting en banc, decided Sarei v. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 10:59 pm
Three (McKeown, joined by Schroeder and Silverman) write the "plurality" opinion. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 6:16 pm
. - Judge Schroeder: Don't you mean "principal" in the sentence (at the top of page 13770) that currently reads: "Hence, negligent driving of postal trucks was a principle activity for which Congress wanted to createliability when the FTCA waived sovereign immunity. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 8:18 pm
I wouldn't start the opinion -- as Judge Schroeder does -- with the following sentence: "This is a death penalty appeal by California state prisoner, and crack marksman, Thomas Francis Edwards. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 4:21 pm
The 9th (Schroeder joined by Fairbank, dissent by N. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 6:21 pm
Judge Schroeder writes the majority opinion and says that this precedent has been undercut by subsequent Supreme Court authority, and hence that the panel is entitled to ignore/overrule it. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 8:09 pm
Schroeder has an article in the Wyoming Law Review entitled "Damage Control? [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 8:43 am
Recently, a federal appeals court held that debt collection agencies cannot avoid responsibility for abuses by blaming them on creditors.In the case of Reichert v. [read post]
The panel reaffirms the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act's requirement that debt collectors must take meaningful actions to assure that the amounts they attempt to collect are accurate.The question decided was whether the "bona fide error" defense under FDCPA provides debt collectors a wide open escape hatch from accountability or will protect debt collectors only where they actually institute measures to ensure that debtors are asked to pay amounts they actually owe.In this Arizona… [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 8:39 am
Source: New York Legislative Retrieval System (LRS), Search run   June 22, 2008. [read post]