Search for: "Scott v. King*"
Results 401 - 420
of 640
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
(IP Dragon) Patent strategies for foreign R&D work in China (Philip Brooks' Patent Infringement Updates) All clichés but still true: Intellectual Property Rights enforcement in China leaves room for improvement (IP Dragon) Recognition and protection of well-known trade marks (International Law Office) Revised Chinese patent law aims at quality, compulsory licensing (Intellectual Property Watch) Zen and the art of intellectual property in China (IP Dragon) Colombia… [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 1:19 pm
Ben-Tzvi v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 5:49 am
The problem here, though, is that the Supreme Court in Miami Herald v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 5:36 pm
FTC v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 3:38 am
The Church may have “won” in Snyder v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 3:10 am
Not long after I finished reading, I felt eerily reminded of another antitrust complaint involving games, platforms (iOS), and even the subscription model (Apple Arcade): Pistacchio v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 10:14 am
Circuit reversed a lower court's judgment this morning in Obama v. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
Abbey, Tarif Abboushi, Joanne Abel, Cortnie Abercrombie, Mitch Abrams, Julie Adams, Scott H. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 3:00 pm
But the threat of violence will tip the balance, see Lozano v. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 2:37 am
Moreover, there appears to be no need for the defendant to prove, as the Supreme Court had required in Spiller v Joseph [2010] UKSC 53, that the comment explicitly or implicitly indicates, at least in general terms, the facts on which it is based. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
Draft No. 1) [hereinafter cited as Restatement]. [9] Restatement at iv (listing the reporters). [10] See id. at v-vi (listing advisers). [11] See id. at vii-viii (listing members). [12] “‘Sunk costs’ . . . are costs that have already been incurred and do not vary with one’s subsequent actions. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 8:20 pm
" Well, the Court assumed that the right is individual in Scott v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 8:55 pm
The Campbell v. [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 9:04 pm
Bruen, Dobbs v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:28 pm
The famous Dred Scott decision of 1857 well illustrated the status of the Negro during slavery. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 5:56 am
(IP Think Tank) US Copyright – Decisions Tenenbaum found guilty of wilful copyright infringement, hit with $675,000 fine (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) (Ars Technica) (Ars Technica) (1709 Copyright Blog) (The IP Factor) (Excess Copyright) (Public Knowledge) (IPKat) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Amazon – Amazon hit with class action lawsuit over Kindle deletion (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) (EFF) Associated Press – Rights… [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 3:48 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:20 pm
Newspapers Journalism and Regulation Former Guardian editor Alan Rusbridger has made the decision not to return as chairman of the Scott Trust. [read post]
