Search for: "Seaman v. Seaman" Results 401 - 420 of 691
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2018, 1:45 pm by 1-800-OBRYANS
In 2005, the court determined the word “vessel” was defined in Stewart v Dutra Construction Co. as “every description of water-craft or other artificial contrivance used, or capable of being used, as a means of transportation on water. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 1:45 pm by 1-800-OBRYANS
In 2005, the court determined the word “vessel” was defined in Stewart v Dutra Construction Co. as “every description of water-craft or other artificial contrivance used, or capable of being used, as a means of transportation on water. [read post]
13 May 2008, 12:19 pm
For example, the fact that the case involves a seaman whose lawsuit is entirely about getting bitten by a mosquito and hence contracting West Nile virus. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 3:28 am by Joel R. Brandes
[Brazil] [Rights of Custody] [well settled] [age and maturity] Seaman v Patterson, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2011 WL 124223 (M.D.Ga.) [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 3:00 am
Townsend (08-214), involving a seaman's right to punitive damages. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 1:21 pm
Carnival Corp., 573 F.3d 1113 (11th Cir. 2009), the Eleventh Circuit concluded that an arbitration clause in a seaman's collective bargaining agreement was unenforceable where it operated in conjunction with a Panamanian choice of law provision to deprive a seaman of his right to bring an action under the Seaman's Wage Act. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 5:29 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
"While no doubt things can happen at sea that could cause an extended halyard to slip out of a seaman’s grasp without negligence, Tagle’s evidence was sufficient to show that this does not ordinarily happen without negligence. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 6:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Judge Edmead explains: “The lack of an attorney-client relationship bars a legal malpractice claim (Seaman v Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, 176 AD3d 538, 539 [1st Dept 2019]). [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 6:25 am by Joel R. Brandes
The district court found that J.V.O. was habitually resident in Mexico at the time of his removal adopting the methodology of  Seaman v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 8:31 am by Broussard & David
In order to be protected by the Jones Act, the Supreme Court rule in Chandris, Inc., v. [read post]