Search for: "Securities Co. v. United States" Results 401 - 420 of 3,792
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2017, 5:00 am by Sophie Fritz
Sept. 08, 2016), the United States Court of Appeals for the Second District dismissed the putative class action of current and former employees (“Plaintiffs”) of JPMorgan Chase & Co. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 5:00 am by Kirstin Dvorchak
 Jun. 6, 2012), the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma denied Deborah G. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 3:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, 56 AD3d 1, 13 [1st Dept 2008]).Defendants are not entitled to summary judgment on their account stated counterclaim, as their claim for legal fees is intertwined with plaintiffs’ legal malpractice claim. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 2:07 am by jonathanturley
While largely lost in election day coverage, United States District Judge James Boasberg dismissed the much heralded case of retired Army Lt. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 7:28 am
Sept. 17, 2010), the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dismissed claims by Nigerian citizens against various multinational oil producers under the Alien Tort Statute, 28 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 11:15 am by John Stigi
Jan. 29, 2014), the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that the short-swing profits rule imposed by Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 10:57 am
Dow Canada argued that under the “stream-of-commerce plus” test first developed by the Supreme Court in Asahi Metal Industries Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 5:01 am by Rachael Hanna
On July 20, the Ninth Circuit declined to rehear en banc Fazaga v. [read post]
Halliburton Co., No. 09-1403 (June 6, 2011), the Supreme Court of the United States decided that in seeking class certification, a plaintiff in an action under the federal securities laws is not required to prove facts demonstrating loss causation. [1] In so holding, the Supreme Court rejected a contrary rule, adopted only by the Fifth Circuit, that proof of loss causation is a prerequisite to class certification. [read post]