Search for: "Selective Insurance Company v. Goings" Results 401 - 420 of 520
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am by INFORRM
The ECtHR found that there had been a violation of the defendant’s Article 6 and Article 10 rights, but acknowledged the companies’ right to sue: Steel v UK [2005] EMLR 314. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:18 am by Kelly
Here is Think IP Strategy’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 11:27 am by Mike Danko
  There are a couple of court opinions that seem to go along with the insurance company's reasoning. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 7:15 am by INFORRM
” Lawyer Mark Lewis pointed out that people don’t always go after the “deep pocketed defendant”; sometimes the company goes for the individual. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:46 pm by Law Lady
STATE FARM FLORIDA INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee/Cross-Appellant. 3rd District.Insurance -- Homeowners -- Hurricane damage to home -- Attorney's fees -- Insurer's post-suit payment of additional policy proceeds entitles insured to section 627.428 attorney's fees where the insurer wrongfully caused its insured to resort to litigation in order to resolve a conflict with its insurer when it was within the… [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 3:37 am by Chip Merlin
Even in jury trials, the itemization of jury verdicts is far shorter than what the insurance companies are having their attorneys ask for in front of judges.A decision yesterday by Florida's Third District Court of Appeal, Pineda v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 10:00 am by Chip Merlin
The discussion is significant: In Travelers, ...The insurance company exercised the right given to it by the policy to make repairs, selected the repair company to do the work, and directed the insureds as to where to take the vehicle to be repaired. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 5:10 am by Daniel E. Cummins
This lack of a consistent common law on the issue leaves the bar and trial court judges with great uncertainty on the issue.The Initial PreferenceIt has been about five years since the automobile accident litigation landscape was changed by a 2005 state Supreme Court case, Insurance Federation of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
– Department of Justice News Release, July 22, 2010 Champion Chemical Company, Imperial Oil Company Inc. and Imperial’s two former officers have agreed to pay at least $1.4 million to resolve actions to enforce a prior agreement to reimburse cleanup costs incurred by the federal government at the Imperial Oil Company Inc. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 2:06 am
  They are rapidly becoming part of the legal landscape for companies that maintain ERISA plans, and for the insurance and financial services companies involved in the administration of these Plans. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:22 am by Frank Pasquale
[T]he National Development and Reform Commission. . . guides macroeconomic planning and intervenes in markets, particularly by setting prices for many products and by influencing national oil companies and other state-owned enterprises [SOEs]. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
“However Justice Stevens is going to come out on an issue, he is going to do it in a way that is very friendly and avuncular and good-natured,” Paul Clement, who was George W. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
(IPKat) ECJ: Designs and a matter of discretion: will Cassina go with the Flos? [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm by Duncan
(IPKat) ECJ: Designs and a matter of discretion: will Cassina go with the Flos? [read post]