Search for: "Server v State"
Results 401 - 420
of 2,500
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2016, 5:37 am
June 3, 2016) (purported collective and class action under the FLSA and state wage and hour laws alleging that defendant family restaurant failed to pay servers overtime and minimum wage and implemented an improper “tip credit”). [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
Two court cases, Flagg v. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 4:31 am
See Unifund CCR Partners v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:04 pm
By Eric Goldman Shropshire v. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 5:56 am
’ United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 1:18 pm
The digital privacy case is called United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 12:08 pm
State v. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 12:08 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 5:54 am
Jensen: (Litigation Guardian of) v. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 7:08 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 10:27 am
By Eric Goldman Perfect 10, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 7:00 am
Walton v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 12:43 am
’ Before this termination, however, Freedman and Zuora accessed the Nimsoft servers on Zuora's network without authorization. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:30 am
Allen v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:00 am
Andy Warhol Foundation v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
” Webster’s Third New Int’l Unabridged Dictionary 1560 (1986); see also United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 3:11 pm
Many states have similar laws.No big surprise here. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 8:17 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 10:01 am
That year, the Court handed down Hamdan v. [read post]
On Delfi v Estonia… Is it time to adopt a good-Samaritan style exemption? – Sophie Stalla-Bourdillon
23 Jun 2015, 4:56 pm
It should be born in mind that in L’Oréal v eBay the CJEU stated 3 things: “The fact that the service provided by the operator of an online marketplace includes the storage of information transmitted to it by its customer-sellers is not in itself a sufficient ground for concluding that that service falls, in all situations, within the scope of Article 14(1) of Directive 2000/31” (at [113]). [read post]
