Search for: "Settle v. State of California"
Results 401 - 420
of 3,039
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2021, 11:43 pm
Goland (1990) 51 Cal.3d 202, 208 [271 Cal.Rptr. 191, 793 P.2d 524]; California Teachers Assn. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 9:41 am
(Lemmon v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:54 pm
§ 2254(d) by readily attributing error to the state court in violation of Woodford v. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 12:30 pm
Last summer, in Espinoza v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 7:43 am
(relisted after the Dec. 4, Dec. 11, Jan. 8, Jan. 15 and Jan. 22 conferences) [NB: the parties have reached an agreement in principle to settle and the court now appears to be holding the case] Lombardo v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 8:52 am
” (Citing Penn-Co v. [read post]
31 May 2021, 9:01 pm
A little over a year ago, in Ramos v. [read post]
28 May 2021, 6:39 am
Sanders v. [read post]
21 May 2021, 6:39 am
But in many instances, state and federal law still poses a hindrance to such scrutiny. [read post]
18 May 2021, 7:29 am
The most analogous prior decision by the Court is Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A. v. [read post]
13 May 2021, 2:24 pm
Under the “class action tolling” rule, the filing of a class action traditionally suspended applicable limitations periods for all would-be class members’ individual claims until class certification was denied or the case settled.[1] Accordingly, if a securities class action settled for an insufficient amount or failed for reasons unrelated to the merits, a pension fund with a large exposure to the fraud could still file a direct action without facing the risk… [read post]
11 May 2021, 9:47 am
Trucking Ass’n v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 12:56 am
This sense of responsibility was exemplary, and I hope the United States District Court for the Northern District of California--sort of my other "home court"--will protect judges, court staff, counsel, parties, and a press pool member at a comparably high level when the Epic Games v. [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 2:14 pm
The unpublished opinion in Melissa Magana v. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 10:32 am
United States, 20-559Issues: (1) Whether Feres v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 9:30 pm
Our firm has quite possibly been awarded attorneys’ fees more times than any other firm in the State of California over the last several years. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 8:43 am
California Bill Would Create Free Banking Services for State’s ResidentsBanking Dive – April 7, 2021 California lawmakers are backing a bill to create BankCal, a government program that would offer a [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 7:32 am
California, 220153Issue: Whether California’s sanctions against Texas and Texans – prohibiting state-funded or state-sponsored travel to Texas because Texas protects the religious freedom of faith-based child welfare providers within its borders – are born of religious animus and violate the Constitution’s privileges and immunities clause, interstate commerce clause and guarantee of equal protection. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 8:18 am
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 5:01 am
The New Censorship Video is Protected by the First Amendment It has long been settled law that the First Amendment is binding on public colleges like Portland State University. [read post]
