Search for: "Sharp v. United States"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,448
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2017, 6:24 pm
Relying on Vess v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 6:07 am
Section 105 of the Copyright Act precludes copyright protection for any work of the United States Government, but applies only to the federal government. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 2:05 am
Since Google LLC is domiciled in the United States, Mr Lloyd required permission to serve out under CPR 6.36, relying on the gateway contained in CPR PD6B – 3.1(9) i.e., claims in tort where damage was sustained, or will be sustained, within the jurisdiction. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 5:01 am
United States—may have far-reaching implications for executive power, judicial power, federalism and administrative law. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 4:21 am
This holding drew a sharp rebuke from the four Justices on the dissent, who said, “Fair use is intended to allow individuals engaged in productive uses to copy small portions of original works that will facilitate their own productive endeavors. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 7:42 am
This list was put together by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 9:15 am
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit in CNH Industrial N.V. v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 7:29 pm
And keep in mind the lemon law definitions in your state. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 8:47 pm
[emphasis added] This is the same approach employed by Justice Sharpe in Griffin v. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Sandy said in 2006 what is both undeniable and widely resisted in this moment, even by the most progressive branches of the Left: That the United States has a constitution that may not be worth saving in the twenty-first century, even if it can be. [read post]
21 May 2009, 3:55 am
United States of America (C.D.Cal. filed Mar. 9, 2009). [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:22 am
” Wilson v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
Instead, the court determined that it must apply the two-prong test announced by the Supreme Court of the United States in Chandris, Inc. v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 3:11 pm
The behavior of the United States government in this case is not one of them. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:23 pm
Section 1 clause 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment states “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 5:30 am
But can those doctrinal departures and sharp caveats be taken at face value? [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 10:15 pm
United States, (SD TX, filed 1/6/2009) seeks a declaratory judgment, injunction, reinstatement and back pay. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 6:18 am
Avianca, Inc., the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York sanctioned attorneys for citing to non-existent, fake cases generated by Open AI’s ChatGPT. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 7:43 am
Sharp v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 5:03 pm
§ 1337(a)(3), a complainant must show that an industry in the United States exists with respect to the articles protected by the asserted patent in the form of:(A) significant investment in plant and equipment; (B) significant employment of labor or capital; or (C) substantial investment in its exploitation, including engineering, research and development, or licensing. [read post]
