Search for: "Shepherd v. Shepherd" Results 401 - 420 of 707
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2012, 8:01 am by WSLL
If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance] Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court Case Name: Shepherd of the Valley Care Center v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 4:03 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Clarke v R [2012] EWCA Crim 9 (20 January 2012) Oliver, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 3114 (21 December 2011) Lawrence, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 3129 (16 December 2011) Court of Appeal (Civi Division) Eastenders Cash & Carry Plc & Ors v HM Revenue & Customs [2012] EWCA Civ 15 (20 January 2012) Star Reefers Pool Inc v JFC Group Co Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 14 (20 January 2012) Charnock & Ors v Rowan &… [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 9:00 am by South Florida Lawyers
(Actually, I think Judge Shepherd has the better argument here).Sunbeam v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 7:21 am by The Book Review Editor
Though the movement encompasses diverse and often contradictory political agendas, it has long had a dominant internal moral narrative about where it comes from and by which it justifies its claims to shepherd a universal moral, political, and legal order. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 2:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Recovery in either lawsuit by Krutonog, who is not a party in this action, or Pivot Point, who was not a party in the Krutonog Action, would not violate the rule against "double recovery for the same injury," Shepherd v. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 4:16 pm by Charon QC
Judge Beatrice Woodcock-Bolton hit the headlines a year ago when her German Shepherd, Georgina, bit one of her neighbours in the leg. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 8:52 am
(One reason for granting review was that the Court of Appeal had left it up to the lower courts whether to apply neutral principles or not, and remain with the old "deference" standard of Watson v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 7:00 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals upholds the $1.50 fee award.The case is Shepherd v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 3:15 pm by Anthony Wright
  However, when, as in the Rennelscase, a parent seeks to modify or terminate the judicially approved visitation rights of a nonparent, the parental presumption is no longer controlling.Case of Rennels v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 5:30 am by AnnMarie McDonald
  For outgoing legislators who may be retiring or have not been reelected, it is the very last chance they have to shepherd bills through the democratic process. [read post]