Search for: "Sheppard v. Sheppard" Results 401 - 420 of 635
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2011, 2:47 am by sally
Fenland District Council v Sheppard and others [2011] EWHC 2829 (Ch); [2011] WLR (D) 316 “In making a vesting order, pursuant to section 320 of the Insolvency Act 1986, in favour of a statutory chargee whose charge ranked in priority to the mortgagees’ charge over the property, the court was not bound to set aside the mortgagees’ charge where the mortgagees did not themselves apply for a vesting order. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 5:06 am by tracey
Court of Appeal Civil Division) Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council v Yerrakalva [2011] EWCA Civ 1255 (03 November 2011) Smithurst v Sealant Construction Services Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 1277 (03 November 2011) Dance v Savery & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 1250 (03 November 2011) BVM Management Ltd v Yeomans (t/a the Great Hall At Mains) & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 1254 (03 November 2011) Drake & Anor v Fripp [2011] EWCA Civ 1279 (03 November 2011) High Court… [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:08 am by New Books Script
48 new acquisitions for the Osgoode Hall Law School Library, including 41 from 2011: HD 58.6 N4334 1999 Negotiating on behalf of others : advice to lawyers, business executives, sports agents, diplomats, politicians, and everybody else edited by Robert H. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 2:38 pm by Will Aitchison
Andrew Frisch has as summary of Norceide v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 4:16 am by Marie Louise
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton (Patents Post-Grant) District Court C D California: TP tops Despatch as court rules up is not down: Despatch Industries v TP Solar (Green Patent Blog)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Late Allergan Reduction – “The allergans” requires all allergans not just one or more: Late Allergen Reduction v Dynarex (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) Mondis – Public statements by foreign… [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 3:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
High Court Denies Inventors Plea to Punish Law Firm Perhaps surprising no one but the petitioner, the strange case of Lockwood v. [read post]