Search for: "Simmons v. Ins*"
Results 401 - 420
of 714
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2015, 5:52 am
Aetna v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 10:57 am
Jackson v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 12:08 pm
It’s time for the seventh volume of Retromark, Darren Meale (Simmons & Simmons)’s rundown of notable trade mark cases over the past six months.Over to Darren:Retromark Volume VII: the last six months in trade marksIt’s now three years since I began Retromark, and we are on to a seventh volume. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 4:38 am
BootsDeckers Outdoor Corporation v J.C. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 7:26 am
(Porter v. [read post]
30 May 2009, 4:16 am
Virginia or Roper v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 11:07 am
Simmons). [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 3:59 am
Darren Meale of Simmons & Simmons presents his fourth instalment [previously: here, here, here] of the Retromark trade mark litigation round up.This time around we have eight worthy UK and EU cases for you, including some big hitters in the form of Cartier, Louboutin and – because Retromark wouldn’t be complete without one – the latest round of theKit Kat saga. 1. [read post]
1 May 2023, 3:30 am
While that case is at the intersection of patent and antitrust law, Justice Smith also hears purely technical patent cases (see this article by law firm Simmons & Simmons).In addition to Oxford, he studied at the University of Munich. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 7:18 am
In Locke v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 10:36 am
The event began with an overview of the unitary patent and unified patent court system by Kevin Mooney (Simmons & Simmons) who has been serving on the Drafting Committee of the Rules of Procedure of the Unified Patent Court. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 10:22 pm
More than you’d think, thanks to the decision of the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) in Continental Reifen Deutschland v Compagnie generale des etablissements Michelin Case C‑84/16 P [2017] EUECJ C-84/16 (26 July 2017).Katfriend Darren Meale (Simmons&Simmons) explains it all.Here’s what Darren writes:“X versus XKINGThe two marks shown in the table below faced off in an opposition before the EUIPO. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 5:06 pm
This amounted to a total award of £18,900, plus an additional ten per cent (Simmons v Castle), making a total of £20,790. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 6:02 am
’ Simmons v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 3:27 pm
Total damages, £39,093.60, plus the 10% Simmons v Castle uplift, giving a total of £43,002.96. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 3:05 pm
State v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 2:24 am
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 7:24 am
Simmons, No. 09 CV 6796 (N.D.Ill. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 3:16 pm
Kidron v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am
” Marquart v. [read post]
