Search for: "Smith v. Kennedy"
Results 401 - 420
of 623
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2018, 7:35 am
[For a summary of the many studies in this area, see the Scholars' Amicus Brief in Vasquez v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 7:35 am
[For a summary of the many studies in this area, see the Scholars' Amicus Brief in Vasquez v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:34 am
v=UrtVZftjbhk. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:28 am
U.S. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 5:59 am
Gist and Gist, Kennedy & Associates, Inc.Case Number: 13-cv-01833 (United States District Court for the Northen District of Georgia)Case Filed: May 31, 2013Qualifying Judgment/Order: May 1, 2015 6/30/15 9/28/15 2015-55 SEC v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 9:56 am
Smith…. [read post]
27 May 2019, 6:17 am
In Smith v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm
In Kennedy v. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
Miller, and phone numbers dialed, in Smith v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am
Harrow v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 9:20 am
”He made a similar point this month in a second capital case, Smith v. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 10:04 am
; Kennedy v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 10:27 am
Making race-based jury selection decisions in violation of Batson v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:32 am
Smith reports for the Tampa Bay Times. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 12:01 am
Since Kelo v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
In both of these two cases, Justice Kennedy voted with the Court's conservatives in dissent. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 10:55 am
In relying on Roper v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
Summary of My Conclusions The single largest body of cases in which Justice Stevens’ retirement could hypothetically shift the balance on the Supreme Court involves ideological issues on which the four most liberal Justices (Stevens, plus Souter, Ginsburg, and Breyer) joined with Justice Kennedy to create a majority. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 9:05 pm
By a 5-4 vote in Tandon v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 9:38 am
He's crazy as a bedbug, and clearly was at the time of the killings and the time of the trial.None of those things mattered because the legal standards as they've developed (in part at the Supreme Court in Smith v. [read post]
