Search for: "Smith v. U.S. Government (Department of Justice)"
Results 401 - 420
of 602
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2014, 8:42 am
<> Bayless v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 3:16 am
United States, 534 U.S. 905 (2001). [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:58 am
See U.S. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 12:46 pm
Smith decision (a decision that I myself support, though I also support the existence of jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction Religious Freedom Restoration Act statutes). [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 8:42 am
The Department of Justice has not, to my knowledge, ever repeated this Bork/Levi “dual filing” strategem. [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 5:12 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 7:28 am
Well, detainee Emad Abdullah Hassan and attorney Clive Stafford Smith have just filed a lawsuit seeking to prevent the government from force-feeding Hassan. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 10:14 am
Bash, a supporting lawyer from the Justice Department. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 4:14 pm
The Sixth Circuit used the Justices’ ruling in Scott v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 4:17 am
Hardison, 432 U.S. 63 (1977) [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 6:00 am
Department of Justice Attorney Sharon Swingle before the Eight Circuit Court of Appeals yesterday. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 2:34 pm
Placing substantial pressure on such exercise can be akin to "prohibiting" it--or so the Court held in the Sherbert line of cases, anyway (the Reagan Justice Department disagreed (see pp. 17-19) and would have required an actual prohibition). [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court holding in the 1979 case of Smith v. [read post]
21 Dec 2013, 7:00 am
Obama stole the headlines—from dismissing Smith v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 5:25 pm
And in the recent Fourth Department decision, People v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 12:41 pm
Judge Leon said that the Supreme Court in the case of Smith v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 6:34 am
Smith v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 10:02 pm
Smith and Robert G. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 10:26 am
Equally fortunately, I can confidently state that none of the programs we will be discussing today were within my purview when I was at the Department of Homeland Security. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 8:59 am
, Smith v. [read post]
