Search for: "South v. South"
Results 401 - 420
of 17,677
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2013, 5:46 pm
Similarly, in Burcaw v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 12:00 am
In Hassam v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 8:55 am
Estate of Hanna, et al. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 11:42 am
Yemen and Mauritius v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 4:05 am
In Planned Parenthood South Atlantic v. [read post]
24 Jun 2007, 9:36 pm
Over at The House of Commons, Catherine Bond has a very useful summary of Copyright Agency Limited v State of New South Wales, a recent decision of the Full Court of the Federal Court on Crown copyright. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:34 pm
In their application, South Africa alleged that Israel had undertaken a genocide against Palestinians. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 6:45 am
Sisney v. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 5:14 am
In Dixie Bell, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 2:11 pm
case of Hilton v. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 7:18 pm
Two secessionist groups, the Vermont-based (AKA liberal as hell) Middlebury Institute and the League of the South (possibly, slightly right wing?) [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 5:47 pm
The trademark battle between The North Face and start-up clothing company The South Butt is getting louder. [read post]
30 Aug 2006, 1:56 pm
Brown could be facing charges in a number of countries; it remains to be seen, however, what future actions will be taken.[1] Susan Watts, Stem Cell Treatment Warning, BBC, Aug. 30, 2006.[2] Id.[3] Id.[4] Id.[5] See United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:04 pm
Out of respect and friendship for my many long-standing friends in South Carolina and Texas, however, I will continue to offer commentary on the events in those States as they continue to unfold.Yesterday, in South Carolina, the federal district court there published its 73-page decision and ruling on the various trademark cases that were before it. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 2:44 am
In the case of R (on the application of Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police ([2020] EWCA Civ 1058) the Court of Appeal held that the live automated facial recognition technology (“AFR”) used by the South Wales Police Force (“SWP”) was unlawful as it was not “in accordance with law” for the purposes of Article 8 of the ECHR. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 12:50 pm
Trademark disputes are common and, often, entertaining, such as one pitting The South Butt and The North Face. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 3:36 am
Related posts:Arresting a person for civil jurisdiction found unconstitutional by Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa In Bid Industrial Holdings (Pty) Ltd v Strang and another... [read post]
10 May 2018, 8:00 am
Hartsock v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 8:00 am
Hartsock v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 12:55 pm
The South Carolina Supreme Court reversed, overruling Epstein v. [read post]
