Search for: "Stallings v. State"
Results 401 - 420
of 889
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2016, 9:54 am
After negotiations stalled, the plaintiff filed a breach of contract lawsuit, seeking damages in the amount of his policy limits. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 9:54 am
After negotiations stalled, the plaintiff filed a breach of contract lawsuit, seeking damages in the amount of his policy limits. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 7:25 am
Verizon New England v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 2:50 pm
Fyock v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 6:50 am
Yesterday I reported on a courtroom insanity of potentially pathological proportions in Munich (Nokia v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 10:20 am
Supreme Court is considering its ruling in National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 12:27 pm
By: Eric Caligiuri In TASER International, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:02 am
It is interesting that at the ECHR the state appeared to represent that defeat as evidence of an anti-abortion majority in the state, particularly when only some 42% of the population turned out to vote. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 10:15 pm
Parallel Networks v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 12:35 am
But a tipping point may have been reached at which conservation will come to an end even in her district court.A few days ago the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied Samsung's motion to stay issuance of a mandate (pending a Supreme Court petition) following a recent appellate ruling on the first California Apple v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 2:35 am
Reading the recently unpublished (not precedential) Appellate Division matter of Connaughton v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 1:32 pm
In a Q&A document accompanying its Monday announcement of a Statement of Objections (SO) against Google's Motorola's pursuit of injunctions against Apple (and creation of an agreement under allegedly-abusive circumstances) the European Commission stated in no uncertain terms its disagreement with some of the terms certain German courts have in recent years imposed on implementers of FRAND standards if they wanted to avoid sales bans under the Orange-Book-Standard framework. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 1:43 am
Appl... by Florian MuellerThe document indicates a blame game, with Epic insinuating that Apple is stalling and Apple pointing a finger at Epic for lack of cooperation. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 8:45 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 7:40 am
Like similar bills passed in other states, this bill includes numerous exemptions, if: (1) The animal test is required by a federal or State regulatory authority and: (a) the ingredient that requires an animal test is in wide use and cannot be replaced by another ingredient, (b) a specific human health problem is associated with the ingredient and the need to conduct an animal test on the ingredient is justified and supported by a research… [read post]
20 May 2010, 10:19 am
In the immediate years after the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 5:42 am
In Cato at Liberty, Trevor Burrus and David McDonald argue that the Court should grant review in Foster v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 7:13 am
At the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin (subscription required), Daniel Cotter looks to past precedent in U.S. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 10:30 am
A Naked Person Issued Notice of Violation, 841 F.Supp. 1153 (M.D.Fla. 1993) & Hoffman v. [read post]
