Search for: "State Bar v. Superior Court" Results 401 - 420 of 2,550
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2021, 9:52 am by Robert Guite and Sascha Henry
”[ix] General, vague statements about a product’s superiority, rather than a misdescription of a specific or absolute characteristic of the product, may lead to dismissal of the claim if the court finds it implausible th [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 9:52 am by Robert Guite and Sascha Henry
”[ix] General, vague statements about a product’s superiority, rather than a misdescription of a specific or absolute characteristic of the product, may lead to dismissal of the claim if the court finds it implausible th [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 5:01 am by Tia Sewell
Superior Court Judge Shana Frost Matini rebuked Pack’s attacks against the OTF. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 8:17 am by Kelsey Clinton
On Dec. 1, 2020, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Nestlé USA, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 8:47 am by Matt Cooper
Jackson (election contest): https://electioncases.osu.edu/case/ward-v-jackson/ From the Maricopa County Superior Court Judge’s decision: “The Court finds no misconduct, no fraud, and no effect on the outcome of the election. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
    Pennsylvania Superior Court Adopts Test for Staying a Civil Lawsuit While Criminal Charges are Pending against DefendantIn a case of first impression, the Pennsylvania Superior Court has ruled in Keesee v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 12:32 pm by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Meanwhile, in the state court system, several trial court judges limited Gallagher v. [read post]
The Court further dismissed two other claims not related to the takings claim and stated that because plaintiffs had three other opportunities to amend their complaint and bring viable claims and failed to do so, the Court would dismiss this case and bar further suit against defendants. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 6:10 am by Matt Cooper
Jackson, a Maricopa County Superior Court judge denied relief requested in a petition filed by the chair of the Arizona Republican Party. [read post]
The Court further dismissed two other claims not related to the takings claim and stated that because plaintiffs had three other opportunities to amend their complaint and bring viable claims and failed to do so, the Court would dismiss this case and bar further suit against defendants. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 2:09 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Background Regarding Federal Forum Provisions In March 2018, the United States Supreme Court held in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]