Search for: "State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co." Results 401 - 420 of 491
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2009, 9:03 am
(Frenkel) (3rd Dept., decided 1/29/2009) The New York Court of Appeals' April 2005 decision in Rekemeyer v State Farm Mut. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 10:36 am
 The court employed a 1:1 ratio as its starting "guidepost," and analyzed the punitive-damage award using the factors from State Farm Mut. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 6:34 am
Co.) (97 NY2d 491 [2002][a SUM carrier that received timely notice of a claim must show prejudice before disclaiming SUM benefits based on late notice of a legal action]) and Rekemeyer v State Farm Mut. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 8:35 am
Under these circumstances, State Farm was precluded from denying coverage on the ground that the policy was fraudulently obtained (see Matter of Metlife Auto & Home v Agudelo, 8 AD3d 571 [2004]; Taradena v Nationwide Mut. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:33 pm
Using the Supreme Court's three touchstones from State Farm Mut. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 12:00 am
Co. (2005) 134 Cal.App.4th 184 are incompatible with the California Supreme Court's decision in State Farm Mut. [read post]