Search for: "State of Maine v. Cross" Results 401 - 420 of 1,367
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2020, 5:00 am by Lama Mourad, Stephanie Schwartz
Today, many of the cases challenging the Trump administration’s new immigration policies (such as Innovation Law Lab v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 11:46 am by Orin Kerr
The main precedent on which the Court relies is a FOIA case, United States Department of Justice v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 7:37 am
 However, now, the transportation of confidential information only requires an email or a USB to cross state or national boundaries. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 8:31 am
The plaintiffs' cross motion also was properly denied.The Second Department also rejected "[t]he plaintiffs' remaining contention [as being] without merit (see Graham v Dunkley, 50 AD3d at 58). [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 1:07 am by Thalia Kruger
 Bills of exchange, cheques and promissory notes are the main classical negotiable instruments. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 7:16 am
Case Name: Three Way, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 7:16 am
Case Name: Three Way, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 8:25 am
It is  hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 2:38 pm by Giles Peaker
The Secretary of State for the Home Department v R (on the application of) Joint Council for The Welfare of Immigrants (2020) EWCA Civ 542 The Court of Appeal have their way with the judicial review of the ‘Right to Rent’ scheme. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:33 pm by Lyle Denniston
Hall, allowing this very kind of cross-border court suits against neighboring states. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 7:01 am by Jack Goldsmith, Oona Hathaway
The main reason is the widely held belief that the Supreme Court blessed the modern massive prior restraint system in the 1980 case Snepp v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 7:00 pm
And the failures of the United States to protect its own story in its own way may well be quite costly--not in Russia, bit within those states in which the bacillus of Russian counter-storytelling can have debilitating effect on the American effort to promote a rules based international order in its own image. [read post]
11 May 2017, 7:02 am by Karel Frielink
The CCJ noted that this case was similar in circumstances to the previous case of Rudisa Beverages & Juices N.V. and Caribbean International Distributors Inc. v The State of Guyana. [read post]