Search for: "State of Maine v. Cross" Results 401 - 420 of 1,367
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2019, 6:17 am
Posted by Ric Marshall, MSCI Inc., on Friday, July 5, 2019 Tags: Boards of Directors, Controlling shareholders, Dual-class stock, ESG, Institutional Investors, Lyft, Shareholder voting, Uber Director Independence and Oversight Obligation in Marchand v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 12:39 pm by Patricia Hughes
(OCA, para.8-9) The OCA relied on the 2014 Supreme Court of Canada decision in Bhasin v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 11:22 am by Josh Fensterbush
And, below is some information on E. coli too. 2015 Outbreak of E. coli O111, Oxford County (Maine) Fair Organism: Non-O157 STEC Vehicle: animal exposure In October 2015 Maine Center for Disease Control and Prevention (ME CDC) staff investigated an outbreak of E. coli O111:H8 infections among two children who attended the Oxford County Fair. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 7:56 am by Russell Spivak, Benjamin Wittes
Think only of how hard it was to resolve the cross-border data transfer issues between the United States and the United Kingdom. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 8:27 pm by Ilya Somin
United States, the double jeopardy/dual sovereignty case. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 10:28 am by Lyle Denniston
That is the so-called “Lemon test,” taking its name from the decision in the case of Lemon v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 5:20 am by Jack Sharman
Whether it is or not, how are in-house counsel with a cross-border practice supposed to think about privilege (or its lack thereof)? [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 2:15 am by Adeline Chong
Under Singapore private international law, the choice of court agreement is governed by the law that governs the main contract unless the parties have indicated otherwise. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:15 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Third-party plaintiffs now appeal from an order that, inter alia, granted the motion of third-party defendants to dismiss the third-party complaint for failure to state a cause of action pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) and denied the cross motion of third-party plaintiffs seeking to disqualify third-party defendants from acting as counsel to plaintiffs in the main action. [read post]
31 May 2019, 9:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Long post, lots of stuff to cover in this opinion.MillerCoors, LLC v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 3:45 am by Jessica Kroeze
Independent claim 1 of the main request (the claims as granted) reads as follows:"1. [read post]
23 May 2019, 6:34 am by UKSC Blog
The onus has shifted to the state to justify an interference with a right. [read post]
21 May 2019, 1:13 am
The most notable cases from national courts are Subafilms, Ltd. v MGM-Pathe Communications Co., 24 F.3d 1088 (9th Cir. 1994) (United States) and Abkco Music & Records Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 5:35 pm by Rebecca Brenikov (AU)
The post It’s NUT yours, it’s mine: Kraft Foods v Bega Cheese and the importance of intellectual property due diligence appeared first on The Brand Protection Blog. [read post]
13 May 2019, 5:35 pm by Rebecca Brenikov (AU)
The post It’s NUT yours, it’s mine: Kraft Foods v Bega Cheese and the importance of intellectual property due diligence appeared first on The Brand Protection Blog. [read post]