Search for: "State v Monroe" Results 401 - 420 of 775
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2011, 3:32 am
In Conrick v Myers, 461 US 1l38, the United States Supreme Court established a two-prong test with respect to claims of dismissal in retaliation for "whistle blowing. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 6:33 am by Kali Borkoski
Today in the Community we are discussing Arizona v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
CMG, which also represents such celebrity images as Marilyn Monroe, Jackie Robinson and Babe Ruth, has attempted "on numerous occasions" to make Twitter take action to block and identify owners of various unauthorized accounts. [read post]
6 May 2014, 8:42 am by WIMS
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   <> Monroe Energy, LLC v. [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The CBA further provides that the CSEA may request arbitration with respect to a grievance, but no provision in the CBA permits an employee to request arbitration, nor is there a provision that makes the employees a party to the collective bargaining agreement (see generally Matter of Case v Monroe Community Coll., 89 NY2d 438, 442-443 [1997]; Matter of Diaz v Pilgrim State Psychiatric Ctr. of State of N.Y., 62 NY2d 693, 695 [1984]). [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The CBA further provides that the CSEA may request arbitration with respect to a grievance, but no provision in the CBA permits an employee to request arbitration, nor is there a provision that makes the employees a party to the collective bargaining agreement (see generally Matter of Case v Monroe Community Coll., 89 NY2d 438, 442-443 [1997]; Matter of Diaz v Pilgrim State Psychiatric Ctr. of State of N.Y., 62 NY2d 693, 695 [1984]). [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 7:24 am by Sally-Ann Underhill and Thinn Nyunt
Other articles have said that Charterers should still seek an ETA in the charter terms so as to ensure that they fall within Monroe. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 12:56 pm
As pointed out in the Sui Generis-a New York Law Blog, at issue in Martinez v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 3:33 am
Moreover, since the issue of MEI's capacity to commence an action was not determined on appeal, collateral estoppel does not bar relitigation of that issue (see Tydings v Greenfield, Stein &amp; Senior, LLP, 11 NY3d 195, 200; Sabbatini v Galati, 43 AD3d 1136; Bergstol v Town of Monroe, 305 AD2d 348). [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 3:29 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
District Court for the District of Columbia’s in State of Texas v. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 6:53 am
The Fourth Department stated that the Family Court only has power which is explicitly conferred on it by statute. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 3:15 am
On October 26, 2012, The Alabama Court of Civil Appeals released its opinion in the case of Hornady Transportation, LLC v. [read post]