Search for: "State v. A. E. B." Results 401 - 420 of 10,075
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by Lisette Mustert
Furthermore, Europol did not comply with the data minimisation and storage limitation principles (Article 28(1)(e) of the initial Regulation). [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 1:28 am by Rose Hughes
The case law relating to pointers and selection inventions is well established CLBA, II-E-1.6.2c)). [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Thus, the declarations were not subject to the general rule of grand jury secrecy because they were not “evidence actually presented to [the grand jury]” nor “anything that may tend to reveal what transpired before it” (see United States v Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 923 F2d 241, 244 [2d Cir 1991], citing Fed Rules Crim Pro rule 6[e][2]). [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
In 2017, NYDFS was one of the first state financial regulators to impose cybersecurity requirements on covered entities. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
To test this, we classify U.S. states based on the percentage of voters who voted for the Republican or Democrat candidate in the 2016 presidential election. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am by Joel R. Brandes
Supreme Court observed that the Automatic Orders are codified within DRL § 236(B)(2)(b). [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 6:00 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
The five judge Bench's decision of the Supreme Court of India in Cox & Kings v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 2:34 pm by Eugene Volokh
In evaluating such an application, the court should grant or deny IFP status based on the applicant's financial resources alone and then independently determine whether the complaint withstands review under § 1915(e)(2)(B). [read post]