Search for: "State v. All"
Results 401 - 420
of 113,792
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2019, 9:58 am
by Dennis Crouch Allen v. [read post]
10 Apr 2025, 8:55 am
But state constitutions are typically an afterthoght in discussions about American constitutionalism, if even thought of at all. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 1:30 am
After the verdict came in late yesterday in the Kodrin v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 3:52 pm
Sterling gave V. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 5:16 am
See United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 9:12 am
Ok, State v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 9:27 am
All briefing is at the ScotusWiki page for Wood v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 2:20 am
R (Child Poverty Action Group) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions 2010 UKSC 54; [2010] WLR (D) 322 ”The only right to recover overpaid social security benefits paid according to an award was that conferred by s 71 of the Social Security Administration Act 1992 which provided an exhaustive scheme for dealing with all overpayments made pursuant to benefit awards and applied only where there had been misrepresentation or non-disclosure. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 9:30 am
As Justice Sotomayor highlighted in her United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 2:00 pm
In striking down a state system of alien registration, the Court in Hines v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 12:00 pm
I’m worried about the future of Roe v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 7:01 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 12:37 pm
Texas v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 9:08 am
Today CAAF released its decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 7:51 am
The court subsequently sentenced appellant to a prison sentence of five years, with all but two years suspended, for distribution and ... [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 7:43 pm
During sentencing, the trial court stated on the record that because ... [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 12:16 pm
United States (1968) and essentially nullified Gray v. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 1:30 am
The Supreme Court in R (Tigere) v Secretary of State for Business Innovation and Skills [2015] UKSC 57 held by a 3:2 majority that the blanket requirement that all applicants for a student loan have “indefinite leave to remain” is discriminatory and must be amended by the Government. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 2:28 pm
The New Jersey Supreme Court recently addressed the parameters of this right in State v. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 2:09 pm
Supreme Court's retroactivity analysis as stated in Teague v. [read post]
