Search for: "State v. Arnold"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,387
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2011, 11:51 am
(Orin Kerr) Back in 2009, I blogged about United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 1:30 am
On 12 July 2024 the English Court of Appeal gave its second FRAND determination judgment, in the context of an appeal and cross-appeal of Mellor J’s first instance decision in IDC v Lenovo. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 5:15 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 7:47 am
Since the landmark 2014 decision of Arnold J in Cartier [here, here, here] (currently under appeal: the appeal will be heard on 13 April) it appears that indeed this type of measure is also available to trade mark owners.IPKat readers will remember that the reason why this was uncertain is because - unlike what happened in relation to Article 8(3) of the InfoSoc Directive (transposed into UK law through the adoption of s97A of the Copyright Designs and… [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 3:56 am
While the Court commented that they did not foresee imposing a general monitoring obligation on platforms, Arnold LJ stated that “Many providers wish to undertake content review for their own commercial reasons, however. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:51 pm
”Contrary to the content and tone of Nunez’s letter, the probation report states Nunez lied when first contacted by police, was “never cooperative,” and after his arrest and release sent a text message to a codefendant stating, 'Gangster rap made us do it lol.'"Dude. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 2:25 am
Source: ACLU v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 2:25 am
Source: ACLU v. [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 4:42 am
In order to succeed on a claim for accounting malpractice, a plaintiff must demonstrate a departure from accepted standards of practice and that the departure was a proximate cause of injury (see Alskom Realty, LLC v Baranik, 189 AD3d 745, 747; Kristina Denise Enters., Inc. v Arnold, 41 AD3d 788, 789). [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
324/09 L’Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie, L’Oréal (UK) Limited v eBay International AG, eBay Europe SARL and eBay (UK) Limited. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 12:46 pm
ARNOLD. [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:21 am
On 4 May 2023, a mere two weeks after the conclusion of the hearing, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Sandoz and Teva v BMS. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 8:54 am
ASKIN v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 8:37 am
Affirmed.Case Name: GILBERT ORTIZ, JR. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 6:42 am
Chamber of Commerce of the United States, et al. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 9:28 am
However, the Court also states (“superfluously”) that even if this would have been the case the Court’s conclusion would remain the same. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 11:03 am
State v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 11:07 am
On February 20, 2008, in an 8-1 decision, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Preston v. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 2:48 pm
Homeland Security Investigations and US Attorneys' offices did just that in Operation Mummy's Curse, which involved the case of United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 6:06 am
’State v. [read post]
