Search for: "State v. B. Rose"
Results 401 - 420
of 636
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2021, 10:58 am
Similarly, Sulzer Mixpac AG v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:53 am
White Rose Food, 237 F.3d 174 (1/10/01). [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 11:12 am
(Disclosure: I represent Kashtanova in connection with their application to register “Rose Engima. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 3:30 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm
Here’s a run-down of a few techniques that can minimize the chance of getting sued for libel in fiction: (a) use disclaimers (more about that later); (b) disassociate the doppelgänger from their real-life counterpart by writing composite characters; (c) depict but do not disparage; and (d) wait for the real-life person to die before publishing your fiction. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm
Here’s a run-down of a few techniques that can minimize the chance of getting sued for libel in fiction: (a) use disclaimers (more about that later); (b) disassociate the doppelgänger from their real-life counterpart by writing composite characters; (c) depict but do not disparage; and (d) wait for the real-life person to die before publishing your fiction. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm
Here’s a run-down of a few techniques that can minimize the chance of getting sued for libel in fiction: (a) use disclaimers (more about that later); (b) disassociate the doppelgänger from their real-life counterpart by writing composite characters; (c) depict but do not disparage; and (d) wait for the real-life person to die before publishing your fiction. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm
Here’s a run-down of a few techniques that can minimize the chance of getting sued for libel in fiction: (a) use disclaimers (more about that later); (b) disassociate the doppelgänger from their real-life counterpart by writing composite characters; (c) depict but do not disparage; and (d) wait for the real-life person to die before publishing your fiction. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 10:47 am
Circuit panel in Shelby County v. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 9:19 pm
Of greater significance, however: the court refused to certify the state-law class, concluding that the interns did not satisfy the commonality requirement under Rule 23(a)(2) and the predominance requirement of Rule 23(b)(3). [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 12:05 pm
Archer & White Sales Inc. and Lamps Plus Inc. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 5:46 pm
Boredom: The Literary History of a State of Mind. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 5:57 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 10:50 am
The nightmare scenario is the famed Winnie the Pooh case in California, Stephen Schlesinger, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Posted by Arthur B. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Posted by Arthur B. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 4:24 am
Rule 6(b). [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 3:25 am
The corresponding provisions in the EPC are Article 83 and Article 100(b).A patent may be insufficient because a skilled person would not be able carry out the invention, i.e. the invention is not enabled. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 10:00 am
Knight also reported that he rose up during a verbal encounter and bumped Felling, but Felling was not hurt. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 5:45 am
Supreme Court’s Wayfair v. [read post]
