Search for: "State v. Barry" Results 401 - 420 of 1,407
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2015, 1:00 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang LLP
In the Court of Appeal, the court considered the development of the case law, especially the recent cases of Murray v Leisureplay Plc [2005] EWCA Civ 963 and El Makdessi v Cavendish Square Holdings BV [2013] EWCA Civ 1539, stating (per Lord Justice Moore-Bick at paragraph 21): “[T]he modern cases thus appear to accept that a clause providing for payment on a breach of a sum of money that exceeds the amount that a court would award as compensation…may not be… [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm by axd10
Simmons and many others Recent Books (via CWRU/OhioLINK) Barry Latzer. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 11:23 am
Barry Barnett Subscribe to our always-on feed. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 6:07 pm by Francis G.X. Pileggi
Six of which cited the case for its procedural holding.(4) See Barry Miller and Casey Stansbury, Iqbal Energizes Motion to Dismiss Practice (March 10, 2010) (discussing Iqbal’s influence in state court matters).(5) In Siemens Financial Services, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 7:47 pm
A false statement of fact is a necessary element in proving a cause of action alleging defamation Goldberg v Levine, 2012 NY Slip Op 05613, Appellate Division, Second Department Supreme Court dismissed Barry Goldberg’s petition seeking to recover damages for alleged defamation based upon certain written and oral statements allegedly made about him by the Steven Levine at town board meetings and in a local newspaper. [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 8:30 am
To determine whether a concerted practice is anticompetitive, close regard, the Court stated, must be paid in particular to the objectives which it is intended to attain and to its economic and legal context (Joined Cases 96/82 to 102/82, 104/82, 105/82, 108/82 and 110/82 IAZ International Belgium and Others v Commission [1983] ECR 3369, paragraph 25, and Case C-209/07 Beef Industry Development Society and Barry Brothers [2008] ECR I0000, paragraphs 16 and 21 - for our… [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 3:49 am
Barry, 144 F.3d 847, 850 n. 2 (D.C.Cir.1998), the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit noted that the reasoning in Suter would extend to other provisions of the AACWA. [read post]