Search for: "State v. Bird"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,175
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
In the space below, we analyze an important and interesting decision, Demers v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 2:24 am
Mission Animal & Bird Hospital, FA1006001330046 (Nat. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 11:31 am
The Supreme Court's decision on sexual assault and consent in R. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 3:03 am
Hindsight arguments concerning selection of one of several reasonable courses of action do not state a viable cause of action for malpractice (Brookwood Cos., Inc. v Alston & Bird LLP, 146 AD3d 662, 667 [2017]). [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 1:48 pm
Supreme Court decision in National Meat Association v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 6:31 am
In April, the Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 8:56 pm
United States. [read post]
7 May 2008, 9:52 pm
" Sarah Bird is on the job [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 4:21 am
(Brookwood Companies, Inc., v Alston & Bird LLP, 146 AD3d 662, 666 [1st Dept 201 7].) [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 9:30 pm
Kershaw, Charles Warren Center, Harvard University, “The Ascendance ofthe Neoliberal Political Order: A Triumph of Interests, Not Ideology”Reuel Schiller, University of California, Hastings College of the Law, “Beyond NewDeal Regulation: Neo-Liberalism and the Modern Administrative State”Commentator and Chair: Mary Furner, UCSBPlenary: Race in the Configuration and Reconfiguration of the New Deal Order Matt Garcia, Arizona State University, “The… [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 4:45 am
Sega; and No Doubt v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 8:07 am
US District Judge James V. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 5:08 pm
Ultimately, CBD was successful in clarifying that the birds are a public trust resource of all the people of the state. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 2:05 pm
Sarver v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 1:05 pm
"Jurisprudence in the United States has long held that the Pledge of Allegiance cannot be made mandatory (most recently in Lane v. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 3:09 am
“A violation of Judiciary Law § 487 requires an intent to deceive (see Judiciary Law § 487), whereas a legal malpractice claim is based on negligent conduct” (Moormann v Perini & Hoerger, 65 AD3d 1106, 1108 [2009]; see Bill Birds, Inc. v Stein Law Firm, P.C., 164 AD3d 635, 637 [2018], affd 35 NY3d 173 [2020]). [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 8:34 pm
Bilski v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 9:03 pm
The Amish agribisinessman from Bird-In-Hand, PA, plays ball with an organization the federal court calls a sovereign citizen group. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 9:30 am
A few months later the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Furman v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 4:13 pm
Co. v. [read post]
