Justia Blawg Search - Law Blogs, Lawyer Blogs, Legal Blogs Directory & Search Engine

The Supreme Court in R (Tigere) v Secretary of State for Business Innovation and Skills [2015] UKSC 57 held by a 3:2 majority that the blanket requirement that all applicants for a student loan have “indefinite leave to remain” is discriminatory and must be amended by the Government. [read post]

UK Supreme Court Blog - http://ukscblog.com/

Opinion in Wood v. Allen

20 Jan 2010, 5:26 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor

C. [read post]

CrimProf Blog - http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/crimprof_blog/

State and subdivisions of state are subject to ADEA regardless of its number of employees in contrast to a private sector employer where the law applies only to "an industry affecting commerce" having twenty or more employees

11 Nov 2018, 11:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press

C. [read post]

New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/

State and subdivisions of state are subject to ADEA regardless of its number of employees in contrast to a private sector employer where the law applies only to "an industry affecting commerce" having twenty or more employees

11 Nov 2018, 11:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press

C. [read post]

New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/

Ind. Decisions - Court of Appeals issues 0 today (and 5 NFP)

14 Mar 2007, 11:05 am

State of Indiana (NFP) William C. [read post]

The Indiana Law Blog - http://indianalawblog.com/

Case Preview: R (C) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions

31 Oct 2017, 10:46 am by EMMA FOUBISTER, MATRIX

In July 2017, the Supreme Court (sitting in a panel comprising Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson, Lord Carnwath and Lord Hughes) heard this appeal relating to whether, in the context of awarding Jobseeker’s Allowance (‘JSA’), the State unjustifiably interfered with the right of transgender persons to have information about their gender reassignment kept private. [read post]

UK Supreme Court Blog - http://ukscblog.com/

ANNE V. McARDLE OBTAINS SUMMARY DISPOSITION IN DECLARATORY ACTION SEEKING A DETERMINATION OF COVERAGE AND PRIORITY FOR PIP AND UM/UIM BENEFITS

18 Nov 2021, 7:12 am by Dale Burmeister

Phyllis C. [read post]

Harvey Kruse, P.C. Blog - http://www.harveykruse.com/blog

Jarvis v. K2, Inc. decided on Section 201(c) grounds.

7 May 2007, 10:10 am

Jarvis v. [read post]

Copywrite - http://copywrite.org

Mr. C. v. John Radcliffe Hospital

19 Apr 2011, 6:25 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.

Mr C, had his life support machine turned off after a ‘do not attempt resuscitation’ note was made in his medical records, despite his daughter stating “expressly that the life support was not to be switched off”. [read post]

Medical Futility - http://medicalfutility.blogspot.com/

State Prefers State Court; The California District Court Says, No Problem.

2 Aug 2010, 6:34 am

C 09-03628 SI, 2009 WL 3809816 (N.D. [read post]

Class Action Fairness Act Blog - http://www.cafalawblog.com/

Skinner v. Switzer - Post-Decision SCOTUScast

31 Mar 2011, 2:05 pm

C. [read post]

Federalist Society SCOTUScast - http://fedsoc.server326.com/audio/SCOTUScast/SCOTUScast.xml

Possession of unregistered firearm in violation of National Firearms Act is not crime of violence for sentencing purposes under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)

12 May 2009, 4:58 am by Russ

STATUTORY CONSTRUCTIONUnited States v. [read post]

Direct Appeal - http://directappeal2.blogspot.com/

Convictions for “actual and attempted Hobbs Act robbery” are crimes of violence under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). And the imposition of 6 consecutive mandatory minimum prison sentences, totaling 115 years’ (based on the “stacking” of five § 924(c) convictions, running consecutively to a 10-year minimum drug sentence), doesn’t violate the Eighth Amendment. United States v. Waite, No. 18-2651, __F.4th__, 2021 WL 3870712 (2d Cir. Aug. 31, 2021) (C.J.J. Cabranes, Raggi, Sullivan).

8 Sep 2021, 1:08 pm by John Lee

United States v. [read post]

Federal Defenders of New York Blog - http://blog.federaldefendersny.org/

Freezing of Terrorist Funds, Social Assistance to Spouses and Interpretation of EU Law: Case C-340/08

2 May 2010, 3:42 am by Bartolus

The Court of Justice recently narrowed the scope of EU measures taken to freeze the funds of designated terrorist organizations in Case C-340/08 M v. [read post]

EU Law Blog - http://eulaw.typepad.com/eulawblog/

Response to Arizona v. United States symposium contributors

19 Jul 2011, 8:53 am by Kevin Johnson - Guest

Importantly, after reading the various takes on United States v. [read post]

SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/