Search for: "State v. C. R."
Results 401 - 420
of 13,652
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2023, 4:30 am
" Linda R. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 8:15 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 8:49 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) SL (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 1063 (19 September 2008) US (Nepal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 1057 (10 September 2008) LA (Uganda) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 1055 (10 September 2008) NR (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 1053 (10 September 2008) MQ… [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 10:23 am
R. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 4:05 am
PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, W & BB v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Z, G, U & Y v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 30 – 31 January 2012. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 11:43 am
(B&C®); James V. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 2:10 pm
The Court of Appeal was asked to consider the case on the basis that: a) SO was an asylum seeker, rather than a failed asylum seeker b) SO was now 20, rather than 23 as thr AIT had found - the AIT's decision not being conclusive (R(A) v Croydon LBC: R(M) v Lambeth LBC [2009] 1 WLR 2557 ) c) The Court was to ignore the fact that SO was receiving education and training as set out in his pathway plan. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 2:10 pm
The Court of Appeal was asked to consider the case on the basis that: a) SO was an asylum seeker, rather than a failed asylum seeker b) SO was now 20, rather than 23 as thr AIT had found - the AIT's decision not being conclusive (R(A) v Croydon LBC: R(M) v Lambeth LBC [2009] 1 WLR 2557 ) c) The Court was to ignore the fact that SO was receiving education and training as set out in his pathway plan. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 8:34 am
Solicitor General Michael R. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
©Kevin C. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 6:37 am
Concurring opinion by Judge John C. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 8:51 am
North Dakota et al v. [read post]
26 May 2018, 2:01 pm
C. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:39 am
See In re Antoine Bordelais, 20 C 4165 (N.D. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 3:00 am
Life of the South Insurance Company v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 5:25 am
This Week in the Supreme Court – w/c 25th April 2022 Hearings in the Supreme Court are now shown live on the Court’s website. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:59 am
Applying Dano (C-333/13, EU:C:2014:2358), member states are not constrained by any EU treaty provision or legislative measure from deciding the level of benefits for Zambrano carers. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 12:00 am
C. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 3:00 pm
C. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 8:37 am
C&C Roofing Supply Inc. [read post]
