Search for: "State v. C. S." Results 401 - 420 of 37,585
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2024, 3:28 pm by Patricia Salkin
To the extent that Plaintiff’s claims were ripe, Defendants argued that Plaintiff’s claims were barred by the 90-Day Statute of Limitations under Section 65009(c)(1). [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
As a practical matter, the burden shifts to the party that wishes to challenge the relied upon facts and data to learn more about the cited studies to show that the facts and data are not sufficient under Rule 702(b), and that the testimony is not the product of reliable methods under Rule 702(c). [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:22 am by Peter Mahler
, to receive distributions as provided in subsection (b), and, if the company dissolves and winds up, to receive specified information pertaining to the company from the date of dissolution as provided in subsection (c). . . . [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 2:07 pm by Larry
Such is the case in Ninestar Corporation et al. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
(C-SPAN) Jedidiah Kroncke reviews Aziz Rana's The Constitutional Bind: How Americans Came to Idolize a Document That Fails Them (Jotwell). [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 5:31 pm by Josh Blackman
I am very familiar with this limbo, as the Defense Distributed case is stuck somewhere between the Garden State and the Lone Star State. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 9:12 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Ct.), with introductory note by Juan Pablo Gomez-Moreno The Foreign State Immunity Law of the People's Republic of China, with introductory note by William S. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 6:35 am by Patricia Salkin
To the extent that Plaintiff’s claims were ripe, Defendants argued that Plaintiff’s claims were barred by the 90-Day Statute of Limitations under Section 65009(c)(1). [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 6:05 am by George Croner
” While the Second Circuit noted in its decision in U.S. v. [read post]