Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B." Results 401 - 420 of 15,268
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2024, 3:59 am by Susanne Gössl
The decision regarding which law should prevail was unilaterally made by the colonial authorities. c) The concept of “state“ Furthemore, an indirect colonial influence on the concept of state within conflict laws is notable. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 1:58 pm
I have heard; Your Grace hath ta’en great pains to qualify His rigorous course; but since he stands obdurate, And that no lawful means can carry me Out of his envy’s reach, I do oppose My patience to his fury, and am arm’d To suffer with a quietness of spirit The very tyranny and rage of his. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:55 pm by Unknown
” The regulations under the statute state that gasoline blend stocks “means (A) Alkylate; (B) Butane; (C) Butene; . . . . [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:09 pm by David Kessler (US) and Susan Ross (US)
  Upon receipt of the public company’s request, how long does the FBI’s December 6, 2023 memo state that the FBI will take to verify the request and assign an agent in the company’s local FBI office: a. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 12:08 am by Adeline Chong
The majority in this case recognised four possible grounds: (a) presence in the foreign territory; (b) filing of a claim or counterclaim; (c) voluntary submission; and (d) agreement to submit to the foreign jurisdiction. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 5:03 am by jonathanturley
Yet, on an IIED, a plaintiff must show that the defendant “(a)intentionally engaged in some conduct toward the plaintiff considered outrageous and intolerable in that it offends the generally accepted standards of decency and morality; (b) with the purpose of inflicting emotional distress or where any reasonable person would have known that such would result; and (c) that severe emotional distress resulted as a direct consequence of the defendant’s conduct. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
C-46, did not provide a defence for the appellant’s use of force against the individual. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 11:00 pm
§1303.505(b) and (c), the Plaintiff’s allegations of “gross” negligence were immaterial to the Plaintiff’s malpractice burden of proof and, as such, would be stricken as impertinent matter in accordance with Pa. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 5:03 pm by Eugene Volokh
The state's transparency interest is "more than trivial," because social media content moderation is a topic of public concern. [read post]