Search for: "State v. Carbone" Results 401 - 420 of 1,563
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2018, 1:04 pm by Lynn L. Bergeson and Carla N. Hutton
  Occupational and Environmental Medicine (OEM) has published the abstracts for the Congress online, including the following ones concerning nanomaterials: “Update of potential hazards of nanomaterials,” by PA Schulte, I Iavicoli; “Overview — update of potential hazards of engineered nanomaterials,” by PA Schulte; “Noninvasive biomonitoring of 3 groups of nanomaterials workers with elevated markers of oxidative stress and inflammation,” by D Pelclova,… [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:25 pm by Joe Koncelik
 In other words, EPA would eventually regulate thousands of new small sources of carbon emissions. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 11:35 am by Madelaine Lane
  The Court ordered oral argument on the application filed by the State Appellate Defender Office in People v. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 5:22 pm
Of those, about 90% of the State Attorneys are not wearing masks. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 10:36 am by Jonathan Kalmuss-Katz
The case arises out of a 2004 suit filed by eight states (including New York), three land trusts and New York City against five electric utilities and one of their subsidiaries, alleged to be the “five largest emitters of carbon dioxide in the United States. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 11:03 am
Questions Presented: (1) Can the EPA (read: Bush Administration) get away with refusing to regulate carbon dioxide in automobile emissions, even though a bunch of states, cities, and environmental groups want it to? [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 8:22 am by Anthony Carbone, PC
Supreme Court on John Doe Defendants The New Jersey State Supreme Court decided Krzykalski v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:00 am by Cara Horowitz
 While the appeal is underway, the State will undoubtedly undertake its new analysis of the benefits and drawbacks of cap and trade compared with carbon taxes and perhaps other options. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 6:14 am
In Matter of Laidlaw Energy and Environmental Inc. v Town of Ellicottville, the court found that the conclusion contained in the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) findings that "serious increases in harmful emissions" from the plant would result in an "unacceptable adverse impact" was not arbitrary and should be upheld. [read post]