Search for: "State v. Christie" Results 401 - 420 of 878
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2021, 4:08 am by Jon L. Gelman
§ 424a(d) explicitly states that a triennial redetermination is not applicable in reverse offset states.Because the NJ Legislature did not include a cost-of-living increase in the statute, and the federal statute exempts reverse offset states from reviewing its benefits triennially, we affirm the order denying a redetermination of benefits and for the reimbursement of overpayment of benefits.Wilhelm v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
This blog’s analysis of Tuesday’s argument in Allen v. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 1:01 pm by Lyle Denniston
Supreme Court’s June decision in U.S. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 8:10 am by Brandon W. Barnett
The 13th District Court of Appeals (Corpus Christie), as it explained in its unpublished opinion in Harris v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Also, on another hot topic, Wayne D’Angelo has a nice summary of hydraulic fracturing developments in various states. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 3:37 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Texas previously was obliged to get such approval under the 1965 Voting Rights Act, but that regime ended with the Supreme Court’s ruling in June in Shelby County v. [read post]
28 Sep 2013, 7:51 am by Mark S. Humphreys
These cases go from the Corpus Christi Court of Appeals in the 1985 case, Group Hospital Services, Inc. v. [read post]