Search for: "State v. Christmas" Results 401 - 420 of 1,217
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2017, 10:14 am by Bernadette Duran-Brown
  If you recall, the Supreme Court granted review of Young’s Market and tied it to the fate of Property Reserve stating that “Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration and disposition of related issues in Property Reserve v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 8:46 am by Quinta Jurecic
  The United States Embassy in Libya suspended its operations in 2014. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 7:00 am by Jacques Berlinerblau
They were buoyed by Justice William Rehnquist’s 1985 dissent in Wallace v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 8:21 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Orange teen critical after Christmas Eve hunting accident, December 27, 2016, By Domenic Poli, The Recorder More Blog Entries: Alcala v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 3:41 am
Teva v Gilead, Abraxis v Comptroller and Wobben v Siemens kick of 2017's patent casesGuest post from Steven Baldwin (Allen & Overy), summarizing 2017's recent patent decisions. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 8:16 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Nursing home sued over fatal Christmas accident, January 6, 2017, By Kay Lazar, Boston Globe More Blog Entries: Alcala v. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 11:49 am
Seeking an ArrowArrow declarations can be granted: Fujifilm v AbbVieGuestKat Eibhlin Vardy discusses Fujifilm Kyowa Kirin Biologics Co., Ltd v AbbVie Biotechnology Ltd & Anor [2017] EWCA Civ 1, which involves two appeals, both raising the question of whether a Court can grant a so called ‘Arrow declaration’, i.e. a declaration that “a product was old or obvious in patent law terms at a particular date”.Guest Post - China's Patent BoomYangjin Li… [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 10:41 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
  Visually Impaired Juror Challenged The Court of Special Appeals in Maryland rendered an opinion in Tremayne Lewis v. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 4:44 am by Jani Ihalainen
After a hard-fought several rounds in the CJEU and the UK courts, it all seemed all over; however, the EU General Court offered us a new judgment as an early Christmas present in mid-December.The case of Mondelez UK Holdings & Services Ltd, formerly Cadbury Holdings Ltd v EUIPO dealt with an EU registered trademark (2632529) for a three-dimensional mark comprising of the Kit Kat chocolate bar without any markings. [read post]