Search for: "State v. Clair" Results 401 - 420 of 573
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2011, 3:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
While the DeCaro defendants contend that a rescission defense based on unilateral mistake would not have been successful in the underlying action for specific performance, specific performance may be denied based on unilateral mistake [*4]where the other party must have been aware of the mistake (see Da Silva v Musso, 53 NY2d 543, 548; Sheridan Drive-In v State of New York, 16 AD2d 400, 405; Harper, Inc. v City of Newburgh, 159 App Div 695, 696-697). [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:17 am by Lawrence Douglas
Admittedly the Justice case recently experienced a vogue of attention in the United States, particularly among lawyers looking for possible precedents for bringing charges against the authors of the “torture memos” in Bush’s Justice Department.[4] But even this brief renaissance of interest quickly waned as the precedential relevance of the Justice appeared smaller than hoped.[5] The fact that the NMT program has long been treated as nothing more than a footnote to the IMT… [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 8:22 am
And would could be a more appropriate item to catch up on than the Catch-up case itself, ITV Broadcasting & others v TvCatchup. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 7:05 am by Kiran Bhat
Jaikumar Vijayan of Computerworld previews Tuesday’s argument in United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 6:26 am by Rob Robinson
(Part 1) http://bit.ly/vZBx4k (Tom Mighell) A Proposal for Preservation Rule Amendments - http://bit.ly/nQ7Jzq (William Wallace Belt) A World of Copyright Confusion on the Web - http://bit.ly/qpGVEW (Craig Smith) ABA Formal Opinion 11-460 is at Odds With Stengart v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 5:42 am by Lyle Denniston
Clair (10-1265) — scope of convicted individual’s right to replace court-appointed lawyer in federal habeas proceeding Williams v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 4:56 am by Rob Robinson
http://tinyurl.com/3z9svqa (Philip Gordon) No Duty to Disclose That Office Equipment Retained Data — Putnam Bank v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 1:44 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Clair, 10-1265, is yet another disaster from the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:59 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Contents include:Stefan Talmon, New Zealand’s Policy of Implied Recognition of States: One Step Ahead or Falling Behind? [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 6:34 am by John Elwood
United States, 10-7515, for United States v. [read post]