Search for: "State v. Constable"
Results 401 - 420
of 517
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Ms Halford, an Assistant Chief Constable with the Merseyside Police had taken her employer to an Industrial Tribunal claiming sex discrimination. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 1:36 am
Halford, an Assistant Chief Constable with the Merseyside Police had taken her employer to an Industrial Tribunal claiming sex discrimination. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
The committee has included an understanding in the resolution of advice and consent that addresses this point (see section V below). [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 1:25 pm
Powers and R. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:50 am
Second, and giving all appropriate weight to what was said in R (C (A Minor)) v Secretary of State for Justice [2008] EWCA Civ 882, [2009] QB 657, and E v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary and another (Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission and others intervening) [2008] UKHL 66, [2009] 1 AC 536, the circumstan [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:38 am
The House of Lords had previously thought that the scheme was lawful, in R (S) v Chief Constable of the South Yorkshire Police [2004] 1 WLR 2196. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:09 am
Today the Supreme Court decided Kentucky v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:46 am
In Hamdi v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 12:12 am
” And as Lord Bingham went on to note in R (on the application of Laporte) v Chief Constable of Gloucestershire Constabulary, the essence of breach of the peace in Howell “was to be found in violence or threatened violence”. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
Nevertheless, on the present state of the law, the technique is legal. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 8:25 am
In Prior v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 5:53 pm
In relation to the harassment claim, the Court adopted the summary of the law from the English case of Dowson v Chief Constable of Northumbria ([2010] EWHC 2612 [142]). [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 4:59 am
This question was addressed in Revill v Newberry [1996] QB 567. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am
(The claimant had relied on the requirements in Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 2 AC 167 at [19]). [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 4:08 am
Supreme Court Duncombe & Ors v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families [2011] UKSC 14 (29 March 2011) Jones v Kaney [2011] UKSC 13 (29 March 2011) Lumba (WL) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 12 (23 March 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Folgate London Market Ltd v Chaucer Insurance Plc [2011] EWCA Civ 328 (31 March 2011) W (Children) [2011] EWCA Civ 345 (30 March 2011) Societe Generale, London… [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:35 pm
Read-the-whole-case rating: 3.R. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 8:43 am
" "Article V [Criminal Justice] - Don't Cut Programs That Save Money"Another document calculates "The Cost of Mental Health Cuts in Harris County," recalling that after the last major round or state cutbacks in 2003 (the 78th Legislature), "persons with severe mental illness who couldn't access services and medications soon destabilized and overwhelmed emergency rooms, law enforcement, county jails and state mental hospitals. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 10:44 pm
Similar points were made in the decision of Rose LJ and Scott Baker J in R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs Ex p World Development Movement [1995] 1 WLR 386, in which the World Development Movement was permitted to challenge a decision not to give assurance that the UK would provide no further funds for a hydro-electric power station outside the jurisdiction. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 3:11 am
Such personnel are shall be known as `special policemen’ and shall have all the power and authority conferred upon constables by the general laws of the state....' [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:55 pm
TTM (By his Litigation Friend TM) v London Borough of Hackney, East London NHS Foundation Trust; Secretary of State for Health – Read judgment The Court of Appeal has ruled that the local authority, but not the detaining hospital, was liable to pay compensation to a person who had been unlawfully detained under Section 3 of the Mental Health Act 1983. [read post]
