Search for: "State v. Cox" Results 401 - 420 of 1,037
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2010, 6:16 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
Similar to its federal counterpart, Mississippi Rule of Evidence 803(4) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay for Statements made for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment and describing medical history, or past or present symptoms, pain, or sensations,... [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
United States v Meng, 2020 BCSC 785 [82] Ms. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 1:18 am by Laura Sandwell
Cox v Ergo Versicherung AG (formerly known as Victoria), heard 20 – 21 January 2014. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
As well as a number of important Supreme Court decisions in the interim, there have been a number of developments, including a large award of damages, in the Obsidian Finance v Cox litigation. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 7:03 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Schlosser PDF Swinomish Indian Tribal Community v. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 9:39 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 Michigan has gone from the "first-floor" to the cellar in terms of the quality of court-appointed criminal defense; at least as measured in terms of compensation.The ACLU is challenging the public defender system in the case of Duncan v State of Michigan. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 9:27 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
 Michigan has gone from the "first-floor" to the cellar in terms of the quality of court-appointed criminal defense; at least as measured in terms of compensation.The ACLU is challenging the public defender system in the case of Duncan v State of Michigan. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 5:34 am
Cox, 343 N.W.2d 641, 643 (Minnesota Supreme Court 1984).State v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 9:21 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Cox Court Denies Restraining Order Against Ex-Boyfriend Who Threatened to Post Revenge Porn — EC v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case  Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 10:54 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Both of these issues were addressed by Washington State Supreme Court in Putman v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 1:50 am by Rosalind English
 Thus, in Cox v Turkey  (20 May 2010), the Strasbourg Court held that Article 10 was engaged by the ban on the re-entry of a US woman who had expressed strong views on issues of Kurdish assimilation and the treatment of Armenians. [read post]