Search for: "State v. Cross"
Results 401 - 420
of 14,900
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2012, 12:07 am
In R (Lord Carlile of Berriew CBE QC and others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 617 (Admin), the Divisional Court upheld, with evident reluctance, the Home Secretary’s decision to exclude Maryam Rajavi, “an eminent dissident Iranian politician”, from the UK – denying her the opportunity from meeting in the Palace of Westminster with 16 prominent cross-party members of the House of Lords and the House of Commons to discuss… [read post]
12 May 2015, 6:04 am
Here is the opinion in Loya v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 9:24 am
The state did not file a PR or cross-PR.] [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 7:48 am
Dunn states that if you intend to contradict an opposing witness on a significant matter you must put the contradictory version of events to the witness on cross examination. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 4:10 am
In Dekker v. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 2:59 am
State v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 6:21 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:09 am
In Anselma Crossing v. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 8:21 pm
The post State v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:50 am
Cross posted at Life Sentences Blog. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 2:53 pm
The January 4, 2023, Court of Appeals opinion in SCDSS v. [read post]
24 Oct 2024, 6:48 pm
See State v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 7:35 am
Case citation: Cross v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 1:54 pm
The United States Supreme Court has decided Kansas v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 8:11 am
Cross-posted from Cato at Liberty, a guest post from my Cato colleague Andrew Grossman: Enough is enough, the Supreme Court ruled today in Harris v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 8:41 am
Lane.More on Teague v. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 5:27 am
Here are the relevant materials in United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 7:38 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in American Legion v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 4:48 pm
In these cases—Elrod v. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 4:09 pm
A three judge panel of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals recently decided the cross appeals in U.S. v. [read post]
