Search for: "State v. Cross #1" Results 401 - 420 of 8,333
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2015, 8:38 am
  In his cross appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) awarded punitive damages in an amount that was less than his cost of litigation, and (2) failed to instruct the jury on statutory prejudgment interest. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 2:49 pm by Andrew Keane Woods, Peter Swire
  In other words, it codifies the so-called Bank of Nova Scotia standard—the standard, developed in United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 6:41 am by Eric Goldman
FOSTA added 230(e)(5) to exclude three categories of claims from 230(c)(1): (1) federal civil claims under 1595, (2) state criminal claims that are coextensive with 1595, and (3) state criminal claims that are coextensive with 2421A. [read post]
7 May 2019, 5:22 am by Jon L. Gelman
Green, 399 U.S. 149, 158 (1970) (describing cross-examination as “the greatest legal engine ever invented for the discovery of truth” (quoting 5 Wigmore on Evidence § 1367 (3d ed. 1940))); State v. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 10:11 am
Respondent-Appellant/Cross-Appellee Betty Mitchell ("Mitchell" or "the state") now appeals the district court's issuance of the writ. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 12:07 pm
I've uploaded a copy of the defense motion to dismiss in United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 3:58 pm
A law firms' second amended cross-complaint against a former client stated causes of action protected by the anti-SLAPP statutePhilipson & Simon v. [read post]