Search for: "State v. Crown" Results 401 - 420 of 1,943
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
R v Royal, 2022 ABCA 330 (CanLII) [12] Accordingly, when the Crown took charge of the matter at that point, the matter should have been brought to a superior court judge, not to another provincial court judge. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 2:33 pm
All future issues or claims relating to the benefits involved are no longer subject to ERISA and are boiled down almost exclusively to state-based contract law. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 4:42 pm by INFORRM
In the context of these applications, the fact of and reasons for his arrest were stated in open court. [read post]
25 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V Neither of the Contracting Parties shall be bound to deliver up its own citizens under this Treaty, but the executive authority of each shall have the power to deliver them up, if, in its discretion, it be deemed proper to do so. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:15 am by sally
High Court (Queen’s Bench) Veolia Water Central Ltd v London Fire & Emergency Planning Authority [2010] EWHC 208 (QB) (09 February 2010) Moore v Hotelplan Ltd (t/a Inghams Travel) & Anor [2010] EWHC 276 (QB) (22 February 2010) Rutherford v Seymour Pierce Ltd [2010] EWHC 375 (QB) (11 February 2010) Law Society of England and Wales v Secretary of State for Justice & Anor [2010] EWHC 352 (QB) (26 February 2010) High Court (Chancery… [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 3:35 am by tracey
Supreme Court Autoclenz Ltd v Belcher & Ors [2011] UKSC 41 (27 July 2011) Belmont Park Investments PTY Ltd v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Ltd & Anor [2011] UKSC 38 (27 July 2011) Jivraj v Hashwani [2011] UKSC 40 (27 July 2011) Houldsworth & Anor v Bridge Trustees Ltd & Anor [2011] UKSC 42 (27 July 2011) Lucasfilm Ltd & Ors v Ainsworth & Anor [2011] UKSC 39 (27 July 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) The Newspaper Licensing… [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 6:51 pm by Ken Moon
  The Crown is also cross-appealing the Court of Appeal finding that for extradition the usual requirement for double criminality contained in the Extradition Act prevails over a treaty with the United States which might suggest otherwise.It is unfortunate that none of the judges on the Supreme Court bench has IP law experience and further, this is only the second appeal involving copyright that has been heard by the Supreme Court since it was set up in 2003.It is likely to be… [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 2:04 pm
”“The sentencing judge did not err in finding the sentence proportional to the gravity of the offence,” said the three-judge panel in its decision in R v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
In Foskett, Peters and Waschckuhn v Ezeugo [2018] EWHC 3694 (QB), three Judges applied for the committal to prison of a man who had repeatedly breached a harassment injunction made in their favour. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by Isabel McArdle
v)              Is the Secretary of State entitled to rely on the defence of act of state? [read post]