Search for: "State v. D. C."
Results 401 - 420
of 14,478
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
., LLC v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
The United States now uses a life + 70 copyright regime, but only for works created on and after January 1, 1978. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:10 am
The need to keep a certain sign free for competitors is not an interest protected under Art. 7(1)(b) EUTMR, but rather of other absolute grounds, such as Artt. 7(1)(c), (d) or (e) EUTMR. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am
The claim was based on the provisions of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (“CCA 1974”), ss 140 A-D, alleging that the failure to disclose commission had rendered the credit relationship between the parties unfair. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 12:06 am
Wearing religious symbols and the CJEU To the surprise of some (though not to us because we’d read the earlier Opinion of Advocate General Collins) on Tuesday, in OP v Commune d’Ans [2023] EUECJ C‑148/22 the CJEU held that the ban on municipal employees wearing signs or dress indicating their religious or philosophical beliefs imposed by the Commune d’Ans, in Belgium, was not incompatible with their rights under the EU… [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 1:45 pm
C. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:52 am
State v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:41 am
Adolly.com, 2023 WL 5672170 (D. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:05 am
” Kansas v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 5:10 pm
Little v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 8:41 am
§ 315(c). [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 12:54 am
In OP v Commune d’Ans [2023] EUECJ C‑148/22, the Grand Chamber handed down a preliminary ruling following a request by the Tribunal du Travail de Liège. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 7:27 am
And Gundy v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
., Inc. v New York State Public Empl. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
., Inc. v New York State Public Empl. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 4:15 am
TTABlogger comment: Since the marks are not similar for Section 2(d) purposes, how can they be similar for Section 43(c) purposes? [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 9:41 am
There were, however, oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 8:07 am
Vidal v. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 10:30 pm
Since then, the Court has specified in a number of cases what the scope of inquiry is for the executing authority when applying this test (See for example Case C-327/18 PPU (RO) and Case C-128/18 (Dorobantu)). [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 6:34 pm
It is worth considering if only because it represents, in a general way, much of the thinking that is gaining increasing traction not just among developing states, but also among a certain sector of academic and policy elites in liberal democratic developed states. [read post]
