Search for: "State v. D. Z." Results 401 - 417 of 417
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2009, 9:54 am
The Board noted that those issues were considered and rejected by the Board in denying the special appeals, and thus the motion for reconsideration did not establish extraordinary circumstances within the meaning of Section 102.48(d)(1) of the Board's Rules. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 11:30 pm by Guido Paola
In its statement of grounds of appeal, the appellant maintained the main request and auxiliary requests 1 to 5 considered in the contested decision and resubmitted those requests as main request and auxiliary requests I to V. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 6:59 am by Kristian Soltes
Department of Justice and a contingent of state attorneys general challenged AmEx’s anti-steering rules in a case that reached the Supreme Court in 2018 as Ohio v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 9:00 am by Michael H Cohen
Strong v. weak corporate practice of medicine One of the tricks about corporate practice of medicine is that it varies by state and in some states the corporate practice of medicine is a really big deal. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 6:30 pm
This represents a most interesting development of Western Hemispher and developing state Leninism, the transposibility of which remains uintested. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 6:48 pm
.) *** Loyalhanna Health Care Associates t/d/b/a Loyalhanna Care Center, a Pennsylvania Limited Partnership (6-CA-28609, et al.; 352 NLRB No. 105) Latrobe, PA June 30, 2008. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:49 pm by Peter Tillers
Topic: Taming Complexity: Rationality, the Law of Evidence, and the Nature of the Legal System Rainhard Z. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 3:18 pm
The Commission on Dietary Supplement Labels (the Commission), a seven-member body that was established under DSHEA to "provide recommendations for...the regulation of label claims and statements for dietary supplements, including the use of literature in connection with the sale of dietary supplements and procedures for the evaluation of such claims," held public meetings around the United States from 1996 through 1997. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
This decision deals with an interesting case of transmission of the opponent status. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Franklin, MA; John Mcdonough, President) Bay State Network, Inc. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 2:30 am by Sander van Rijnswou
Under German insolvency law, the debtor does not lose its legal capacity even if it loses the power to administer and dispose of the insolvency estate (see Schulte, Patentgesetz mit EPÜ, 10th edition, Introduction, paragraph 217).3.3 For the reasons stated above, the board had no reason to interrupt t [read post]
26 Jun 2005, 1:39 pm
According to the present technological state of the art, such a patina cannot be created artificially. [read post]