Search for: "State v. Dames" Results 401 - 420 of 708
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am by Peter Margulies
§1182(a)(9)(B)(v), Congress precluded judicial review of decisions by the attorney general to waive (or refuse to waive) a restriction on the admission of foreign nationals who had accrued periods of unlawful presence in the United States. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm by Amy Howe
Casey, the 1992 decision reaffirming Roe v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
On 1 March 2022 Nicklin J heard an application in the case of SMO v Tik Tok Inc. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am by John Elwood
In University of Notre Dame v. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat and Dennis Aftergut
” That characterization ignored the ruling’s profound real-world effect, preventing 85%-90% of women from exercising their rights under Roe v. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 6:47 am
The decisions of Judge Colin Birss QC in the Patents County Court earlier this year in Dame Vivienne Westwood v Anthony Knight (noted by the IPKat here and here) made fascinating reading. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 5:30 am by Jennifer Brand
”   The first live webinar in the series, The Legacy of Lawrence v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 9:03 am by Lyle Denniston
  The first of those cases has already reached the Supreme Court in the case of University of Notre Dame v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 8:53 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Sierra Club v. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 6:05 am by Leila Nadya Sadat
In an article forthcoming in the Notre Dame Law Review, “The Conferred Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court,” I argue that these objections fail as a general matter, and for the same reason, they do not bar the ICC from issuing these specific warrants. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:13 pm by INFORRM
Art, Music and Copyright The Evan Law blog has an article summarising Finley v. [read post]
7 Jul 2018, 1:05 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Where as most potential Supreme Court nominees are circumspect about their views of Roe v. [read post]