Search for: "State v. Dodge" Results 401 - 420 of 1,099
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2018, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
[Kevin Grasha, Cincinnati Enquirer; Daniel Gill, Bloomberg Law; McGirr v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 5:01 pm by Colin O'Keefe
I once got in an argument with a group over whether or not some states still executed prisoners by firing squad. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 2:00 pm
  Other appellate courts have dodged the issue in one way or another. [read post]
24 May 2011, 10:55 pm by Maria Roche
On the Secretary of State’s application, the matter was reconsidered. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 2:48 pm
Arkinson, in which a unanimous SCOTUS assured us that if a bankruptcy court is confronted with a state law issue masquerading as a “core” issue—such as, in this case, a fraudulent transfer lawsuit—that invokes the specter of Stern v. [read post]
7 Dec 2024, 4:59 am by Just Security
Military for Immigration Enforcement: A Primer by Elizabeth Goitein (@LizaGoitein) Department of Treasury / First Amendment Treasury’s Reversal on Sanctions Authority Is a Victory for Free Speech by Joshua Andresen and Xiangnong (George) Wang Supreme Court / International Law Hungary v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 3:22 pm by Gene Quinn
In March of 2006, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in eBay Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 9:41 pm by Timothy B. Lee
In a Monday court filing for the case formally known as Ingenuity LLC v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 11:31 am
  Plaintiffs in the Infuse litigation tried to use off-label use to dodge both types of preemption but they were unsuccessful in sliding through that “narrow gap. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 8:36 am by PaulKostro
Pascale, 113 N.J. 20, 29 (1988); In re Dodge, 50 N.J. 192, 216 (1967); Hill v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 5:25 am
To view a copy of the Court of Appeals's decision, please use this link: People v. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 7:56 pm by David Super
  Nothing in Article V grants Congress that power, and it is difficult to see Congress doing so when roughly forty states would have less influence under such a system than under one-state-one vote. [read post]