Search for: "State v. Dutch" Results 401 - 420 of 1,320
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2023, 3:43 am by Alessandro Cerri
It is also questionable whether the Court was correct in stating that consumer perception will only be relevant in certain circumstances, when the CJEU stated at least twice in Louboutin (at least in the English translation – see paras 43 and 48) that it was ‘necessary’, in order to determine whether a marketplace operator makes ‘use’ of a sign, to assess consumer perception. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks |  BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 10:59 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
Yes it is, the Grand Chamber of the European Court held on April 16th in Anton Las v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 12:08 pm by Sarah Freuden, Alex Zerden
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 621 F.3d 111 (2d Cir. 2010) (Kiobel I), affʹd on other grounds, Kiobel v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 5:36 pm by Lyle Denniston
Holder — state law conviction for possessing small amount of marijuana as a basis for deportation 11-345 — Fisher v. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 9:31 am
  Chevron has repeatedly stated that it has no duty to stop the gas flaring.[10] III. [read post]