Search for: "State v. E. D."
Results 401 - 420
of 10,443
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2018, 9:25 pm
People for the State of New York v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 5:08 am
State v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
James E. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 12:34 pm
The bill would make commission of the “caller identification spoofing” offense a Class E felony. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 4:01 am
At the end of yesterday's hearing in Tafas/SmithKlineBeecham v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:38 am
STATE V. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 5:30 am
I'd sure appreciate your help. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 3:12 pm
E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2] respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of… [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 8:39 am
Miller v. [read post]
9 Oct 2004, 3:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:02 pm
Co., 463 U.S. 29, 52, 57 (1983) (remanding for further agency consideration when the agency's view of the facts was accepted but the Court 'appreciate[d] the limitations of th[e] record in supporting the agency's decision'); Cook v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 1:42 pm
The Appeals Court summarized the case saying, Universal Crop Protection Alliance, LLC, a formulator and distributor of a herbicide known as 2,4-D (or 2,4-D Amine), and its parent company, Universal Cooperatives (collectively, Universal), successfully defended a lawsuit brought by a group of cotton farmers in Arkansas state court for damages arising from off-target aerial application of the herbicide. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 7:37 am
GoDaddy Inc., 2021 WL 2416829 (D. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 11:26 am
State v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:06 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 1:20 pm
§ 1114(2)(D)(v), seeking to obtain a declaratory judgment that its registration and use of the domain name casasbahia.com is not unlawful under the ACPA. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 7:31 am
Mr Justice Carr accepted this and said that Magnitone was seeking to run a new case not suggested at trial that the accused products fell outside of Integer [E], when at trial the Court was only told to be concerned about Integer [D]. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 4:04 pm
To come back to the IPT, it applies the rulings in the judgement by the European Court of Human Right in Weber & Saravia v Germany [2008] and Kennedy v United Kingdom [2011] to solve issues 2 and 3 (Mention is also made of R E v United Kingdom [2016] and Szabo & Vissy v Hungary). [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 10:05 pm
New York., D. of Delaware, N.D. [read post]
