Search for: "State v. E. E. B."
Results 401 - 420
of 10,008
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2023, 4:30 am
See Raines v. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 2:46 pm
Brandon Beck has been assisting with research and strategic planning in United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 3:29 pm
Bar Assoc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 8:08 am
Burkel, et al., for the CDC v-safe COVID-19 Pregnancy Registry Team, “Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons,” 384 New Engl. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:53 am
§ 9-11-5(b) sets forth the requirements for making service in person, by mail, and by e-mail. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 6:05 am
Brown v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 10:05 am
“[B]oth state law and county ordinances prohibit encroachments on the right-of-way of any public road”; State law “authorizes the County Road Commissioner to remove, after appropriate notice, any encroachment placed without a permit in any public right-of-way. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
See Doe v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
ANALYZING THE LEGAL STANDARD Who counts as an officer of the United States? [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm
Dec. 6, 2022); see also Horwin v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 10:05 am
In the August 23, 2023 opinion in Moore v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division opined that contrary to the Employee's contention, the record before the hearing officer contained substantial evidence to sustain the findings of misconduct and, citing Matter of Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 32 NY3d at 1046, and, contrary to the Employee's assertion, noted that "hearsay statements ... were admissible" in a Civil Service Law §75 administrative disciplinary action. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division opined that contrary to the Employee's contention, the record before the hearing officer contained substantial evidence to sustain the findings of misconduct and, citing Matter of Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 32 NY3d at 1046, and, contrary to the Employee's assertion, noted that "hearsay statements ... were admissible" in a Civil Service Law §75 administrative disciplinary action. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 5:33 am
Code, § 5811(b)(1)]. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 7:45 pm
Richard and Mary Eshelman Faculty Scholar; Professor of Law and International Affairs; Pennsylvania State University | 239 Lewis Katz Building, University Park, PA 16802 1.814.863.3640 (direct) || lcb11@psu.edu First I want to thank Marcelo Thompson, Han Zhu, and Dean Fu Hualing, and all those who organized this workshop. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
Bar discipline, mostly secret in many states. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 7:09 pm
Ltd v. 99 Trade Co. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 2:14 pm
V. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 1:07 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
Haywood v. [read post]
