Search for: "State v. F. T."
Results 401 - 420
of 18,311
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Kahn v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 11:44 am
After all, it is hard to explain “why deriving metadata through technical acts of copying and analyzing that metadata through logistic regression should be fair use, but analyzing that data by training a machine learning classifier to perform a different kind of logistic regression that produces a predictive model wouldn’t be. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 8:32 am
Sales v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:43 am
Apotex Inc., 790 F. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:16 am
Haute Diggity Dog, LLC, 507 F.3d 252 (4th Cir. 2007)) and the “My Other Bag” tote bag (Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 6:38 am
Kohn v. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 1:54 pm
Dep’t of Educ. of N.Y., 16 F.4th 1070, 1076 (2d Cir. 2021). [read post]
9 Dec 2023, 7:39 am
” Fosse v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 12:51 pm
In United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 6:00 pm
Shouldn't the UNCITRAL be working on this? [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 5:39 pm
" … {The dissent states that the supreme court in State v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 2:25 pm
Army, 875 F.2d 699 (1989) (requiring the Army to reenlist Perry Watkins, an admitted homosexual) and Snetsinger v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 7:14 am
Dep't of State (D.D.C.) -- ruling that agency properly relied on Exemption 3, in conjunction with 8 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:30 am
Forbes, Inc., 241 F.3d 552 (7th Cir. 2001), opinion prevailed as a defense. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
., LLC v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:16 am
Noonan v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:16 am
Noonan v. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
Why wouldn’t they be interested? [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am
The couple returned to the United States in 1957. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 12:44 pm
Hence, ‘[t]he requirement of originality under the [CDPA] is that the work must be an expression of that author's own intellectual creation’ (Banner, para 26).The guidance provided by the CJEU to the determine the sort of creative choices with which copyright is concerned has been regarded as ‘helpful’ by the Court of Appeal (Kogan v Martin, para 45). [read post]
