Search for: "State v. Family Child Care"
Results 401 - 420
of 3,110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2017, 5:13 am
The US Department of State has issued guidance which stated that these notice requirements are not applicable if the child in question is an American citizen, even if they hold dual citizenship. [read post]
10 May 2017, 6:17 am
Utility defendant moved for summary judgment, arguing it owed the boy no duty of care as a matter of law under the state’s recreational use statute – even though the family paid a $50 entrance fee. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 9:05 am
It is not a third party or the State that seeks to intrude into the protected sphere of family autonomy. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 9:35 am
Gitter v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:28 am
Spidell Family Law, by Megan E. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 2:22 pm
In East Sussex Children Services v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 9:43 am
Mullins v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 10:03 am
From State v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:05 pm
The Child was born in Tequixquiac, Mexico on January 25, 2021, and, until his removal to the United States, lived with his parents, who never married, at Petitioner’s family residence in Mexico City, Mexico. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 6:09 am
“to come to the United States as a family. [read post]
14 Dec 2019, 6:13 am
– Today, 26 states and the District of Columbia, 75 members of Congress and more than 30 organizations filed friend-of-the-court briefs before the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in support of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) in Brackeen v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 4:51 pm
In Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
24 May 2015, 4:35 pm
Troxel v. [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 1:09 am
., Cabinet for Health and Family Services v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 10:50 am
Within a day, the Mother and the children flew to New York City, where the Mother had family. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 2:50 pm
In the case of McMahon v. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 5:13 pm
State Bar of Texas Section Report - Family Law - Fall 2008 by Jimmy L. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 9:12 pm
The order provides, however, that DHS may separate families when “there is a concern that detention of a child with the child's alien parent would post a risk to the child’s welfare. [read post]
20 May 2009, 4:28 pm
The case prayed in aid by Southwark, R(G) v Barnet, actually concerned accommodation for a child together with its mother. it was not in issue that the child was owed the s.20 duty, the question was did the duty extend to accommodating the family. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 8:00 pm
As Johnstone was unable to secure child care that accommodated this schedule, she asked the CBSA for a fixed full-time schedule. [read post]
