Search for: "State v. Fees"
Results 401 - 420
of 20,968
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2023, 4:48 pm
The Departments establishment of the IDR fee for post-February 20, 2025 disputes and their previous December 15, 2023 announcement of the full reopening of the IDR portal for all dispute categories are part of the Departments’ ongoing response to the August 3, 2023 Federal District court ruling in Texas Medical Association, et al. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 12:20 pm
Park v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 8:10 am
Recently, a federal jury in the Middle District of Missouri found the National Association of Realtors (“NAR”) and two major real estate brokerages—Keller Willams and HomeServices of America—liable under United States antitrust laws for conspiring to fix prices in the class action lawsuit, Burnett v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 2:48 pm
State-registered advisers need to examine their states’ regulations to determine who constitutes a “client. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 1:35 pm
Simpson Strong-Tie Co. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 4:25 am
In Nimkoff v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 4:22 am
The case is entitled Aziz et al. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:25 am
Defendant was not discharged for cause, nor did it charge legal fees for any work associated with the motion practice ensuing from the supplemental disclosures (see Decolator, Cohen & DiPrisco v Lysaght, Lysaght & Kramer, 304 AD2d 86, 91 [1st Dept 2003]). [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
Stephen further stated that he was in the process of registering the word for advertising and media business with the aim of providing marketing, branding, and related services, there was a lot of interest in the possibility of registering such a term. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 9:01 am
See Section 191-d (7)(b)(i) and (v). [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 8:56 am
by Dennis Crouch CTD Networks v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 3:42 pm
In McDonnell v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:41 am
” Huber v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am
Bank National Association v Langner, 168 AD3d 1021 [2d Dept 2019])” The Court observed that CPLR § 2309 sets forth the way oaths and affirmations are to be administered and notes in section (c) regarding oaths and affirmations taken without the state: An oath or affirmation taken without the state shall be treated as if taken within the state if it is accompanied by such certificate or certificates as would be required to entitle a deed acknowledged… [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 5:08 am
Holland & Knight v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
United States. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 12:03 pm
In Scanlon et al. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 7:43 am
Lawyers who engage in discriminatory conduct can also be sanctioned under the state analogs to Rule 8.4(g). [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
In Durkin v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 8:33 pm
”[16] However, the experience of the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) should serve as a cautionary tale. [read post]
